U.S. Economy: The Good and The Bad

Investors over the past few weeks have been beset by a strong dose of volatility in both news reports and stock markets. Economists disagree on where the U.S. economy will go from this point forward and their forecasts seem to get increasingly divergent by the day. A recent Bloomberg article, “It’s the Dog Days of Summer, Shall We Take a Double Dip?: The Ticker,” discusses varying views on the likelihood of a double dip recession. The article enlightens both the optimistic and pessimistic sides of the issue. Their conclusion indicates that although the U.S. and global economies are clearly moderating, the consensus scenario is that recession will be avoided.

The Bad:

Polls conducted recently by the Wall Street Journal and USA Today reveal that the consensus on the likelihood of the U.S. entering another recession has risen to 30%, twice as high as a few months ago. Economists generally accept that U.S. growth will be slower and unemployment will remain inflated for a longer period of time than previously thought. On August 22, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, and JPMorgan Chase cut their 2011 and 2012 GDP projections. Finally, the need to reduce government spending will handcuff legislators from adopting stimulus measures and the Fed has few tools left to jump-start growth.

The Good:

The consensus on the likelihood of entering another recession is still below 50%. Bob Doll, the chief equity analyst at BlackRock, states: “Stocks have fallen 15% or more in the past few weeks, but since the Great Depression there have been 30 market declines of 15% -- but only two of those predicted a recession.” Even with their reduced U.S growth outlook, Citigroup will projects a 20% stock increase over the next 12 months. The jobs picture is discouraging, but is still strong enough to avoid recession. To be sure, the 12-month data regarding new jobless claims has improved and bank lending conditions have eased. Credit flows, an indicator of reinvested savings, continue to be adequate. Corporations are generating strong profits and carry record cash holdings. Recessions are usually associated with having a negative bond yield curve (whose short-term rates rise above long-term rates), and right now the U.S. has the opposite. Schwab economists sum up these positives with the observation that the U.S. will avoid recession “due to continued positive leading economic indicators, an improving jobs picture, solid corporate balance sheets and a still-steep yield curve.”

The slowing U.S. economy is expected to have only a limited impact on global growth. For example, Morgan Stanley recently cut global estimated GDP growth in 2011 to 3.9 percent from 4.2. The dramatic fall of world stock markets in the past few weeks, which we consider excessive, discounts a much greater than 0.3 percent drop in global growth. For a more in-depth view of Marietta’s opinions on this issue, please refer to earlier posted blogs “Clouds Gathering on the U.S. and International Economic Horizon” and “Financial Market Turmoil.”

Fed Watch

In recent Outlooks and blogs, we have emphasized the importance of Federal Reserve policy in influencing the direction of the U.S. stock market and the relative performance of industry sectors and investment styles. In particular, we have pointed out that in 1994 and again in 2004 the Fed reversed accommodative, anti-recession, low-rate policies and raised rates as economic recoveries gathered steam. In both cases, the Fed rate hikes abruptly halted powerful stock market rallies and led to rotational shifts in investor stock preference. We have also noted the negative impact thus far in 2010 on the prior stock market rallies in China, India, and Brazil as governments and central banks tightened credit in an effort to ward off potential inflation and asset bubbles.

To most Fed watchers, the question not whether the Fed will raise rates but when will they raise rates. For months the Fed has indicated its intention to keep rates low for “an extended period” even though the country has emerged from recession and the recovery has strengthened. At the end of 2009, we expected the Fed to raise rates late in the 2nd quarter or early in the 3rd quarter, by which time we anticipated that job growth would be the catalyst to trigger a change in Fed policy. In April, we subsequently pushed back our expectation to November when the Fed acknowledged economic growth, but stated its concern for the sustainability of the recovery and left in place its “extended period” language in statements regarding their interest rate deliberations. A Wall Street Journal survey of economists, disclosed in a May 12 article, finds that the consensus view in early April was for a hike in November, but now 42% expect the Fed to hold off on tightening until at least 2011. The WSJ attributes their shift in opinion to the European debt crisis, which “underscores the fragility of the global financial system and the risk, however small, of outside shocks derailing the recovery.” As a support to this view, on May 14 Chicago Federal Reserve President Charles Evans stated “I think the risks, obviously, with the global situation make things a little bit more uncertain than we were expecting…so, if anything, I am even more comfortable with my assessment that accommodation continues to be important.”

As the WSJ article points out, low inflation under 2% combines with the European turmoil to provide the Fed with room to keep policy on hold. We presume that the Fed prefers to avoid a rate increase in the politically sensitive months leading up to the national elections in November and thus welcomes this breathing space. On the other hand, the Fed is also painfully aware of the criticism of former Fed Chairman Greenspan and the Fed’s “too little, too late” rate raising policy coming out of the last recession, which permitted the creation of the housing bubble. We will monitor closely and comment on developments at the Fed in future blogs.

Threats to Global Economy and Markets

The blood pressure of the investment community has been elevated several notches in recent weeks as threats to the global economic recovery have surfaced. Stock markets around the world have slumped with unnerving volatility, even though a consensus of economic forecasters have reassuringly continued to project a solid if not spectacular global recovery in 2010 and the latest batch of corporate earnings reports have been well above analysts’ expectations. Creating additional palpitations has been a sharp drop in commodity prices and a corresponding rise in the dollar as risk-averse investors have responded with a flight to safety.

The Economist (February 13-19, pp. 13, 70-72) provides an excellent, succinct overview of the dangers confronting the world economy and offers pragmatic recommendations to government and central bank policy makers. In its cover article, the magazine emphasizes the gulf between the troubled U.S., European, and Japanese economies “where there are few signs of strong private- demand growth,” and the leading emerging economies of China, India, and Brazil, where there is “strong growth in domestic demand and scant spare capacity.”

The challenge for the policy makers in the developed countries is to engineer growth even as they are forced to come to grips with massive budget deficits. The problem is especially vexing for European leaders, who are under pressure to formulate a rescue plan for Greece and, possibly, for Portugal and Spain as well. We think the European Union will successfully if grudgingly provide a solution that will calm jittery currency markets, although the remedy may result in painful austerity for the indebted countries and political fallout for those governments, notably Germany, that may be called upon to finance a bailout.

In sharp contrast, the Chinese, Indian, and Brazilian governments are concerned that rapid growth will trigger inflation and create asset bubbles. Policy makers here are taking steps to rein in growth, which in turn worries some investors that their braking activity will become excessive and produce a slowdown that endangers the global recovery. The focus is on bank lending restrictions imposed by the Chinese government since the beginning of the year. We share The Economist’s view that “for all the market’s worries, there are few signs that it [the Chinese government] will tighten too much too fast. A slowing is possible, but a serious stumble seems unlikely.” We also note a recent article in The Wall Street Journal (2/8/2010), which reports that last week Citigroup, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, and J.P. Morgan Research all issued reports touting upside expectations in emerging markets this year.

Although we think these threats to the world economy and equity markets will eventually be resolved without calamity, we also acknowledge that investors should not become overly sanguine. We will continue to monitor closely these international developments and we remain flexible. We also alert clients to expect market volatility until these matters are resolved.